Tue 30 Jan 2007
I’ve been wanting to see the movie Jesus Camp ever since it came out this summer– the responses to it were so passionate and varied. On one end of the spectrum, you had people who were utterly stunned by what they saw, calling for someone to rescue those children from the fascists. On the other end you had people praising the summer camp to the skies and calling for all Christians to similarly train their children.
Now I hear it’s up for an Oscar. It’s a good movie. I’d recommend it to anyone who is interested in American sub-cultures or Christian life or childhood/coming of age stories. The filmmakers, who incidentally are not quite as even-handed as they would like us to believe (I noticed the ominous music undergirding certain scenes), follow a handful of children from Missouri to the Kids on Fire summer camp. Before they go, we meet their families and get a peek at their lives. They are all homeschooled and attend a pentecostal church. One girl prays over her bowling ball on a group outing; another dances to Christian rock in front of her mirror and explains the difficulty of dancing always for God, and never in “the flesh.” A boy laughs at Veggie Tales with his brother and discusses with his mom the “bad reasoning” surrounding global warming.
The kids the filmmakers chose to highlight are great. They are articulate, loving, and passionate. They are creative and silly and secure. Any parent would be proud of kids like these. I know a lot of families who are raising their kids in a very similar way: sheltered, homeschooled, and family- and church- focused. My church teaches children to do some of the same things the summer camp does: pray, prophesy, evangelize, worship.
The children’s pastor who runs the camp, Becky Fisher, is also great in many ways. She has a sense of humor and a wild closet full of props (brains, goo, etc) that she uses for object lessons. I’m totally stealing her balloon idea. She takes children seriously and treats them (for the most part) lovingly, and she never forgets that they are children. The kids, after their time in her camp, leave with a sense of their importance to her, to God, to each other, and the world. All good.
So I can see why many parents and people who work with children feel inspired by the movie. I can also see why it makes some people feel worried. First of all, Becky and the children’s families seem to come from a standpoint labeled by its critics as “dominionist”. From what I understand, that perspective is characterized by a sense of the inevitability of truth: we have the truth, truth is slowly marching over the land, and it is only a matter of time before all of America and the world recognize the Lordship of Christ. To hasten the coming of that day, Christians should move to take power in every domain, spiritual and worldy, and thereby further the cause of Christ. Every sphere of life, from government to education to medicine to entertainment to the free market, should come under the dominion of the Kingdom of God, and it is our job to make that happen through prayer and obedience and allegiance to truth. (If I have mischaracterized dominionist thinking in any way, please offer an alternative description or clarification).
The way this works out practically is in comments like one boy’s mother made, that there was no other possible explanation for the natural world than a six day creation: it was the only thing that made sense. It results in intercessory prayer meetings which become very passionate, often with people crying, yelling, and clapping; or in prayer walks, where people lay spiritual claim to a specific area. It means organizing protests and political action on issues that are seen as especially Christian, such as pro-life activities. It means training to join fields and industries where Christian influence is seen as being in short supply. There’s something of a “beat them at their own game” vibe involved. The Christian entertainment company that produces the Veggie Tales cartoons was hailed for many years as a light in a dark industry, though recently it received criticism for agreeing to tone down its religious message for afternoon network cartoons. A lot of people saw that as a step backwards and a compromise of truth.
At any rate, the kids at camp cry. A lot. They are moved to tears in worship, in repentance of sin, and in intercession for their country. For people not familiar with this type of Christian expression, it can seem a little freaky to hear a group of children crying and screaming to, for instance, “take back the land.” During one strange moment, they all extend their hands to pray over a cardboard cutout of George Bush. Though they were praying generically for him to govern with godly wisdom, it is darn hard to imagine that they would have done the same over a cut-out of Bill Clinton or John Kerry.
It’s unfortunate that war metaphors and comparisons to terrorist camps are made so often by Becky and others in the film. She positions her camp as the Christian alternative to jihadist schools in Palestine and elsewhere, whose fanatical dedication she seems to admire. Neither she nor anyone else in the film intended to convey that Christians should actually pick up weapons and storm the ramparts of the secular world, but I wouldn’t be surprised if some people took it that way.
I myself have participated in many of the same activities at different points in my life. They’re not quite as freaky as they appear. Some of them– especially prayer– still form an important part of my response to my culture. Others, I have stepped away from entirely. I’m not a dominionist; I don’t share the same dream of an ideal American culture, and though I want to add love and goodness to the world around me, I feel no need to seek positions of power to do so.
I have two concerns with the way the children in the movie were being taught. First, scripture was almost never read, referenced or quoted. The power and persuasiveness seemed almost entirely experiential. Of course, this could have been a choice of the filmmakers to focus only on the most intense moments; the kids did seem to carry their bibles around a lot.
Second, the children were being raised in what appears to be an entirely closed, self-referential system. They go from home to church to camp and back again. Any encounter with outsiders appears to be mainly an opportunity for evangelism (there’s a great moment when a little girl approaches a group of elderly black men hanging out on the Capitol Mall in D.C.). They are told that every part of their worldview is equally, unquestionably true, from learning to love each other to politically conservative positions on global warming. They are urged to have absolute confidence in what they have been taught.
The claustrophobia of this closed circle came home to me especially when one girl started explaining that there are some churches where God will not visit, because the people just sit there and mouth the words of songs during the service. Even fellow Christians, she seemed to be saying, can be outside the circle. Another moment that this point was pressed home was when the filmmakers contrived to have Becky call a progressive Christian radio show. At the host’s questions, she became flustered, lost her usual articulate poise, and ended up saying silly things, though the other guy’s challenge was not a particularly good one. She wasn’t used to being confronted with other opinions.
I worry for these children because as they grow up they will encounter many other views and ideas. They may not know how to interact with people who don’t share their basic values. They may never learn to reach out beyond superficial contacts or conversion efforts. Alternatively, they may realize that some parts of their closed circle of truth are open to credible challenge or multiple interpretations, even among Christians. They may, upon finding these vulnerabilities, lose faith in the whole package and entirely abandon the way of the cross. That would be sad indeed.
I want to clarify that my comments here are confined to particular children as they and their families and teachers are portrayed in the film– not Christian homeschooling families in general, which come in many shapes and sizes.
I also had a few problems with the film itself. As I mentioned earlier, the music sometimes sent a certain message. There was some artificial cutting and pasting designed to marry the confirmation of Judge Alito and the intercessory prayer at the summer camp, even though they took place during completely different times of year. The directors also staged some scenes after the camp was over– first, the kids meet withan awkward, un-funny Ted Haggard at New Life Church in Colorado Springs; then, they suddenly appear in a pro-life protest in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. These scenes are so contrived that they fail to demonstrate the themes presented earlier in the film. But the patient attention shown to the small moments of their lives at home and their spiritual awakening at camp make it all worthwhile.
January 30th, 2007 at 1:28 pm
Wow. I really want to see this now. I especially enjoyed paragraphs 11-13. You articulate concerns and observations I’ve been harboring myself but have been unable to express quite as well. The counter argument I get a lot is that children are not mature or strong enough in their faith to be left to themselves in “the world”. A sort of throwing them in with the sharks mentality. I am interested to see how this dialogue unfolds.
January 30th, 2007 at 9:24 pm
Cool.
January 31st, 2007 at 10:35 am
Very good post, Erin.
Mine is one of those homeschooling, family- and church-centered families that you mentioned knowing. I share your concerns regarding such families. There has to be a balance between sheltering children (which, IMO, *must* be a part of a parent’s job, especially in early childhood) and giving them the tools to interact effectively with — and value — those “outside the circle.”
I’m not dominionist either. (I’d never heard the term, but I can totally understand it from my own observations of the culture of hs’ing, and by your characterizations.) However, there is at least a part of me that sincerely applauds the efforts of… high-quality dominionist movements, like Vision Forum. If you’re going to take over the world, might as well do it with some intellectual excellence, not to mention excellence in art, in home life, in personal care (as opposed to the slovenly hs’ers that do certainly exist), and in financial soundness, etc.
One of the reasons I chose the main hs’ing curriculum that we use is because of its broader worldview, its lack of (what I call) Amero-centric perspective… and its willingness to investigate cultures, religions, and historical events that don’t submit to the Christian or Western worldview, encouraging dialogue on those topics, and all the more as the children mature. I didn’t want my kids to have the experience I did: being raised in a Christian school which viewed EVERY form of Christianity outside its own as cultic (including Catholicism), and completely avoiding topics such as evolution, since it falls outside the specific scope of what the Bible teaches. (I’m still a young-earth creationist, but I want my kids to know *why* I/we believe that, not just “because the Bible says so.” Or worse, just because *I* say so.)
Also, the “more righteous than thou” attitude really concerns me. I communicate to my kids that, basically, “there but for the grace of God go [we]” and that only God is the judge of hearts, and understands the motives of each individual. We do the things we do because we sincerely believe in them — many of the things we do, I believe would be beneficial to the hearts and lives of most… but not *all* of them. Just because *we* do something doesn’t mean that that’s the best — or, rather the *only* best option. IOW, the American Protestant Homeschooling way of life is not the right choice for everyone, though I sincerely believe that Jesus *is* right for everyone.
January 31st, 2007 at 11:52 am
Hey!
Sarah (Zollner) Case pointed me to this great write-up… I’d love to publish this in next month’s Next Wave (http://next-wave.org), an online e-zine I edit.
What do you think? Could you drop me an email?
February 1st, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Thanks, Erin, for this very thoughtful post. I’ve been wondering about this movie, especially since I read a DVD review of it just yesterday. (I haven’t seen it) I suspect I would have a very, very similar reaction to yours, as you and I seem to share a lot of the same church history, etc. It’s absolutely fascinating, and rare, to see something that is simultaneously praised by ‘opposing camps.’ Good observation on the ominous music. That’s something I could see a lot of people not noticing, but definitely internalizing.
February 1st, 2007 at 9:50 pm
Shannon, yes, I’ve heard some parents say that their first and most important duty is to protect their children.
Karen, thanks for sharing your perspective here. As a person without kids, my ideas on raising them are only speculation and observation. So it’s nice to hear from someone who has both thought through the issues and made decisions based on them. It sounds like you do a lot to help your kids encounter a variety of perspectives. Does that also extend to socializing with different kinds of people? If so, how does that work? And yes, I too, am a fan of doing things with excellence. And, I looked up “dominionist” the other day (it was a word i’d discovered in a fit of blog surfing once) and discovered that it has something of a pejorative connotation, which wasn’t my intent. However, there doesn’t seem to be a more neutral term to describe that perspective.
Hi Bob, thanks for stopping by. I sent you an email.
Kate, I recommend seeing it. A lot of people in the blog world have gone so far as to call the intense emotionalism of the camp brainwashing and child abuse. For me, the jury is out on the question of how manipulative the camp speakers and Becky Fisher actually are. Some moments seem clearly over the line; others, not so much. It’s hard to get a sense of the camp as a whole.
February 2nd, 2007 at 6:23 pm
“It sounds like you do a lot to help your kids encounter a variety of perspectives. Does that also extend to socializing with different kinds of people? If so, how does that work?”
Well… it would help if I wasn’t so easily tired by social interaction.
Maybe this sounds lame, but my kids get social interaction just playing at the park, with neighborhood friends (none of whom homeschool), with various cousins & extended family, at the playland at Burger King, friends from church, etc… There are very few people we socialize with that are completely like us — very few homeschoolers. I actually don’t participate in a homeschooling group (though we get together from time to time w/ other hs’ers), at least partly because I’ve observed so many hs’ers become omphaloskeptic
It’s easy to become engulfed in Homeschool World to the exclusion of others, and I don’t want to go there… I have an aversion to nearsightedness, and I’m constantly on the lookout for how to expand our perspectives, yet protect our basic values.
We were quite good friends with a Hindu family (until the mom’s work schedule changed, and we couldn’t spend time w/ them anymore)…
My problem w/ having a limited crossection of folks with whom to socialize might be more of a function of suburban living than homeschooling.
February 4th, 2007 at 10:59 pm
Karen– I don’t think it sounds lame. It sounds like your kids have a fun life.
February 16th, 2007 at 11:57 pm
Great article! Please post all or most of it as a review at netflix.com. While the volunteer netflix reviewers of “Jesus Camp” are rightfully scornful of the camp, they themselves demonstrate massive ignorance of Christianity; that in itself is more concerning than a small group of uninfluential pentecostal zealots (in fact, this tiny cadre may owe their existence in part to dogmatic elitists and ivory tower gatekeepers who censor far less radical voices). Most reviewers find it easy to equate a fringe group (Jesus Camp) that caters to a slightly larger fringe group(Christian dominionists) as representative of evangelicalism as a whole. C’mon people, you can make a cult out of anything, including _________ (liberalism?). A lack of perspective regarding the beautiful and diverse biosphere that is Christianity equals myopia. Hmmmm, isn’t that what the Jesus Campers are guilty of?
February 17th, 2007 at 9:00 pm
Joe, thanks for stopping by. I’ve noticed, as you have, that most people discussing the movie treat it as an expose of some larger issue or cultural phenomenon rather than a treatment of a small sub-culture. and yes, most of them are highly critical. I think that’s par for the course with social documentaries; the process of making people’s private lives public has the effect of turning them into symbols and object lessons. I myself used their stories as a springboard for talking about homeschooling. Thanks for the suggestion to post the review on Netflix– I’ve never done that before, but I’ll check it out.